Mechanical Thrombectomy Using a Large Dual-Layer Stent Retriever for Near-Occlusion of the Common Carotid Bifurcation Caused by a Giant Free-Floating Thrombus.

Objective: We report a case of near-occlusion of the common carotid bifurcation caused by a giant free-floating thrombus (FFT) successfully treated with mechanical thrombectomy using a large dual-layer stent retriever. Case Presentation: A 51-year-old man presented to our hospital with dysarthria, right hemiparalysis, and paresthesia. MRI revealed an acute infarction of the left cortical watershed zone, and MRA revealed decreased signals in the left common carotid bifurcation. Carotid ultrasonography demonstrated a giant FFT in the left common carotid bifurcation. Angiography revealed a giant thrombus extending from the left common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the external carotid artery. As direct aspiration from both a balloon-guided catheter (BGC) and an aspiration catheter (AC) was ineffective, we deployed a large dual-layer stent retriever from the ICA to the CCA with an AC-connected aspiration pump and retrieved it under manual aspiration through the BGC. The giant thrombus was successfully removed, and complete recanalization was achieved without distal embolisms. Conclusion: Although there is no established treatment for giant thrombi in the carotid artery, mechanical thrombectomy using a large dual-layer stent retriever may be an effective treatment option.

Progressive edematous lesions in subacute phase after neuroendovascular therapy.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of edematous lesions in the subacute phase is a rare complication following neuroendovascular therapy. Effective management of these lesions remains unclear. In this report, a case with progressive edematous lesions in the subacute phase after neuroendovascular therapy was described, and the clinical features and therapeutic strategies were discussed. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old female with a large, right cavernous internal carotid artery aneurysm was treated with a flow diverter. Left hemiparesis developed 15 days after the procedure, and multiple edematous lesions in areas of prior catheter procedures were revealed on radiological findings. Steroid pulse therapy was employed, and the lesions were gradually reduced without any additional neurological deficits. No recurrence was recognized in the follow-up study. CONCLUSION: In some reports, pathological findings indicate that these lesions result from the presence of foreign bodies, and emboli could be caused by cotton fibers or hydrophilic polymers used as surface coatings on endovascular catheters. In this case, the edematous lesions were most likely caused by hydrophilic polymer emboli. Steroid pulse therapy had a beneficial effect on the lesions. It is important to effectively manage prescribed periods after the procedure to avoid such a rare complication.